650 N. First Street
PO Box 96
Woodburn, OR 97071
Phone: 503.981.3441
Woodburn Independent Online
News
Education
Sports
Hometown
Opinion
Classifieds
Public Notice
Subscriptions
About Us
Photos/Videos
Local News
News Briefs
Obituaries
Regional News
Police/Safety
Events Calendar
Archives
NW News Links
Submit News
Sunday, March 14, 2010
Fair
,
48° F
[
sign in
]
City forms focus group to study WDO
By:
Rachel Cavanaugh
Published:
11/3/2009 9:33:07 AM
WOODBURN — A focus group has begun examining architectural standards for an update to the Woodburn Development Ordinance (WDO).
The ordinance, which establishes detailed standards for building and development in Woodburn, has been criticized in the past as being too rigid. The goal of the nine-member group is to simplify the ordinance and make it more “user-friendly.”
Members have been working through the document section by section.
“We’re concerned about landscape standards,” said Jim Hendryx, community development director. “When new buildings go in, what do they have to plant? How pretty does it have to be?
“Now we’re going through the architectural standards. When you buil
d a building, what does it have to look like?”
Eventually the group, which was appointed this spring by the mayor and confirmed by council, will get into land use.
The idea of the update is to change existing standards to meet the city’s current needs.
“Right now, to build a house in the community … you have to meet (a number of) design standards,” he said.
“You have to have the roof which has to be a certain pitch. You have to have so much of the house glass. You have to have a front porch that has to be so big. You’ve got to have some articulation in the building, like in dormer windows and things. You can’t have a flat roof.”
The group may decide to change standards around the edges of the city or in new subdivisions, he said.
“So if they want to do a flat roof, for instance, they could,” he said. “Currently flat roofs aren’t allowed it the city, period.”
The bottom line, Hendryx said, is the group must come up with a way to make the document easier to use.
“The WDO is a very complicated ordinance and it’s difficult for the public … to understand,” he said. “… You can’t pick it up and read it a go, ‘oh, I can do this?’ You have to read multiple sections of it.”
In some cases, he said, people have to read two or three chapters to get the answer to a question.
“And then when you get the answer, I’m scratching my head going, ‘is that (really) the answer?’”
The document is separate from the Downtown Development Plan, which is also being updated.
Besides being broader in geographical scope, Hendryx said the WDO is an immediate document covering specific details. The downtown plan, by contrast, paints a general picture of the future and outlines ways to get there.
He called the latter a “vision document.”
After the WDO group completes its review, a period of community outreach and public feedback will begin.
Share
|
Email
(
log in to rate
)
{1}
##LOC[OK]##
{1}
##LOC[OK]##
##LOC[Cancel]##
{1}
##LOC[OK]##
##LOC[Cancel]##
Comments
We welcome comments from registered users. Comments are solely the responsibility of those who post them; their viewpoints are not endorsed by the Woodburn Independent and WoodburnIndependent.com.
(read more)
The Woodburn Independent and WoodburnIndependent.com reserve the right to refrain from publishing or to remove posts that include foul language, personal or abusive attacks, or are off-topic. Posts will be signed with the first and last initial and home city associated with the registered user’s account; the registered user’s address, phone and e-mail address will remain private, as noted in our
privacy policy
. (
close help tip
)
Highlight
ship name
no comments have been added
Sign In
or
Register
to Add Comment
{1}
##LOC[OK]##
{1}
##LOC[OK]##
##LOC[Cancel]##
{1}
##LOC[OK]##
##LOC[Cancel]##
Most Read
Most Comments
Mendoza, Ortiz engaged
Police impersonator on the loose
A competitor — both in and out of the pool
(last 7 days)
{1}
##LOC[OK]##
{1}
##LOC[OK]##
##LOC[Cancel]##
{1}
##LOC[OK]##
##LOC[Cancel]##
{1}
##LOC[OK]##
{1}
##LOC[OK]##
##LOC[Cancel]##
{1}
##LOC[OK]##
##LOC[Cancel]##
Share this on:
Mixx
Digg
FaceBook
del.icio.us
Reddit
stumbleupon
My Space